What’s The Most CPU Efficient DAW? – 5 DAWs Compared

What Is The Most CPU Efficient DAW | Integraudio.com

Reaper is designed to be a cheaper and more lightweight DAW that can support most plugins without any issues. 

There is a ton of DAWs out there, and their uses vary from user to user. This wide variety of choices often leaves starters confused as to which software they should use.

We made a further comparison to see which one really stands out in the market. We compared their price, size, compatibility, processor needed, and minimum RAM required and tabled the results down below:

Logic Pro X
Ableton Live 10
FL Studio 20
$99 for Live intro $449 for Live Standard $749 for Live Suite
€99,99 Cubase Elements 10.5 €331,99 Cubase Artist 10.5 €581,99 Cubase Pro 10.5
$99 for Fruity edition and $199 for Producer Edition
$60 Discounted Licence $225 Commercial Licence
MacOS 10.8.4 and later only
Windows 7/8/10 (64 bit only) MacOS 10.7 and later
Windows 7/8/10 (32 and 64 bit) macOS (32 and 64 bit)
Windows 7/8/10 (32 and 64 bit) macOS 10.13 only
Windows 7/8/10 (32 and 64 bit) macOS (32 and 64 bit)
Intel® Core™2 Duo processor. Intel® Core™ i5 processor or faster recommended
Windows: 64-bit Intel® (Intel® Core™ i5 processor or faster recommended) or AMD multi-core processor MacOS: Intel® Core™2 Duo processor. Intel® Core™ i5 processor or faster recommended
Intel Core i series or AMD Ryzen multi-core for both windows and macOS Intel I5 or faster is recommended
2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 / AMD Athlon 64 (or later) compatible CPU with full SSE2 support
2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 / AMD Athlon 64 (or later) compatible CPU with full SSE2 support
Minimum RAM

The main topic of discussion in this article, however, is the CPU usage by each DAW. We want to determine which DAW best optimizes the use of CPU resources. So, we tested out most of the common DAWs and compiled a list of the top 5 most CPU efficient DAWs, and compared them with each other. The table above clearly supports our evaluation, and the claim in choosing Reaper as the most CPU efficient is true. In terms of market performance, Reaper is the cheapest and most lightweight DAW out there.

Related Readings:

How To Produce Music On An Old PC Effectively? (PC & DAW Tips)

What Is a Digital Audio Workstation (DAW)? How Does It Work?

Top 10 DAW Software 2022 For DnB, House, EDM, Rock, Metal, Hip-Hop

FL Studio vs. Ableton vs. Logic vs. Cubase vs. Pro Tools Which is Best ?

Ableton 10 Live – Beginner’s Illustrated Guide

How To Make Music Without Using A DAW?

How To Develop DAW Software?

What PC, RAM & CPU Do I Need For Music Production In 2022?

Top 5 Most CPU Efficient DAWs

1. Reaper

Source: reaper.fm

Reaper is specifically designed to be a cheaper and more lightweight DAW that is able to support most plugins without any issues. As an FL Studio user, I have been personally testing this DAW over the course of a week using heavyweight VST like Omnisphere, Serum, Waves, and Izotope and I’ve got to say that I was impressed.

It has managed to live up to its reputation with seamless startup and loading times. Reaper also has an incredibly efficient GUI with minimum bloat and unnecessary tabs that make it CPU-friendly and user-friendly.

Reaper comes with a few CPU saving features like:

  • Performance Meter: Reaper’s performance meter offers the most cohesive performance analysis. This enables the user to see exactly which tracks are using how much power.
  • Reaper’s Render: this is a very smart way of quickly rendering selected tracks to stem tracks and muting original. Muting the original track frees up a huge amount of CPU memory

However, testing Reaper in bigger projects with a huge ton of plugins, you start to see its flaws. Crashing and stuttering became more often and loading times slowed down significantly. Overall, I would personally recommend this DAW for any startup user and any user that is working on smaller projects.

4 ways to reduce CPU load in REAPER

2. FL Studio 20

My personal favorite DAW that I have been using for years now. FL Studio comes with a huge number of built-in plugins and effects which makes the need for 3rd party plugins unnecessary.FL Studio itself automatically optimizes 3rd party plugins used for better performance.

Overall, FL studio is a fantastic option for a seamless, optimal CPU consumption DAW. A stand-out feature that makes FL Studio especially powerful is the “Smart Disable” feature. This ensures that if a plugin is not used, it is automatically switched off to save memory and allow the processor to run lighter.

In addition to that, FL Studio has a built-in latency monitor that detects which plugin is going to need how much CPU.
FL Studio also runs on relatively low specs like 4GB RAM and Intel Pentium processor, makings it available for a wide range of devices. FL Studio’s disadvantages include no support for macOS 32-bit, and its GUI mainly uses more CPU when compared to other DAWs mentioned.

Stand-out features that make FL Studio especially powerful include:

  • Smart Disable: This ensures that if a plugin is not being used, then it is automatically switched off to save memory and allows the processor to run lighter.
  • Quality Sampler: This will help you to bounce your audio fast and make your project light on the CPU
Boost your CPU Performance | FL Studio Tutorial

3. Steinberg Cubase

The support for VST3 (unlike many other DAWs) means that Cubase is able to automatically suspend unused plugins which saves a lot of CPU.
Unfortunately, this software does not lack many flaws. Cubase uses a pretty bad GUI which tends to overuse CPU from time to time and has a ton of bugs that causes the program to crash sometimes.

Cubase gives the user a few techniques that can be used to optimize CPU resource allocation. These include:

  • Freezing instruments: allow the user to export MIDI tracks into an audio file that is saved and be used for playback instead of the instrument itself.
  • Export Audio mixdown: self-explanatory. Allows the user to mixdown and export all audio files.
  • Render in Place: MIDI tracks are rendered and placed in the exact same location in the grid for the user to use it instead of the MIDI tracks which use more power.
  • Direct Offline Processing: this is used to save power by rendering a new audio file in the background and allowing playback from the saved file.
Maximizing Track Count & Saving CPU in Cubase

4. Ableton Live 10

Ableton is one of the most stable and CPU-friendly DAWs out there. This is because of its highly effective built-in plugins which really encourages its user to stick with them and not look for 3rd party plugins.

That being said though, Ableton still performs incredibly well on 3rd party plugins. We personally tested it on Waves, Fabfilter, and Izotope plugins and have seen significantly better performance when compared to Logic Pro X. Anyway, if you are looking for Free VST Compressor Plugins, check this post. The main disadvantage of Ableton Live 10 is that it only works on 64-bit systems and requires at least a dual-core processor.

Features that reduce CPU usage include:

  • Disable unused inputs and outputs: Ableton users can disable the mono input pair of the same stereo input or vice versa to reduce excessive CPU usage
  • Disabling warping in Simpler
  • Freeze tracks: this feature creates an audio file of the original track to be used instead, thus saving more power since fewer effects are going to be used
Ableton - 10 Tips to handle your CPU Problems

5. Logic Pro X

Available exclusively to Mac OS users, Logic Pro X is a go-to software for Apple users. This is because it is specifically optimized to work efficiently in all apple computers and since it is designed exclusively for that, you will be guaranteed a smooth performance.

Logic Pro X requires only 4 GB of RAM and will work on integrated graphics as well. Comparing it to its predecessor Logic Pro 9 based on personal usage and based on the Evan Multicore Benchmark test which uses a combination of bundled Logic plug-ins and samples, Logic Pro X performs significantly better.

However, its main disadvantage comes from its advantage itself and that is, it runs only on Mac devices. This means that the start-up cost is pretty high (since Macbooks are known to be expensive) and the lowest benchmark for testing is high as well (since most Macbooks come with decent CPUs).

Certain features that allow a user to save more CPU power include:

  • Turn off animations: Logic Pro X is amongst a few DAWs that has an option to turn off GUI animation to reduce CPU usage.
  • Switch off sample-accurate automation: using this feature reduces CPU usages in projects that do not use automation.


In conclusion, the choice of DAW is totally subjective and based on personal preference. For example, some people may choose to choose FL Studio for its user-friendly GUI. Others may find Ableton to be their choice for its powerful built-in plugins. However, this does not undermine the importance of other DAWs and that is the beauty behind it all.

Every DAW has its pros and cons and every con has a workaround if you get familiar with the software. I personally find myself using up to 3 DAWs, each to do a specific task for example; I use FL Studio to make beats, Ableton to record vocals, and Cubase to mix and master, it’s only a matter of preference. In terms of CPU usage, I have experienced the best performance from Reaper but that does not necessarily mean that Reaper is the best DAW. It all depends on the user. If you need more detailed information about what would be the best DAW for you, check this list.

Don`t copy text!
Scroll to Top