Can Audio Interface Reduce CPU Usage? Yes, But…

Can Audio Interface Reduce CPU Usage? |

This article will discuss whether an audio interface can reduce CPU load and improve computer performance. 

Let us start with an introduction to audio interfaces and understand what they are. An audio interface is a device that connects to a computer, tablet, or mobile device and provides high-quality input and output connections for recording and playing back audio.

It typically intermediates between a computer and professional audio equipment, such as microphones, instruments, and studio monitors. Audio interfaces can come in various forms, including USB, Thunderbolt, and FireWire.

They allow for low-latency recording and monitoring, which means there is minimal delay between when the sound is captured and when it is played back through headphones or speakers. This is important for musicians and producers who need to be able to hear themselves in real time while recording.

In addition to providing high-quality sound, audio interfaces often come with preamps, which amplify the signal from a microphone or instrument. This can result in a cleaner and louder recording than possible without an interface. Audio interfaces may offer additional features, such as built-in effects or MIDI inputs and outputs. Now let’s arrive at the main topic of discussion.

Do audio interfaces reduce CPU Usage?

An audio interface with onboard DSP or Thunderbolt, PCIe, or FireWire connections can reduce CPU load as they can share tasks with the processor. Conversely, USB-based interfaces may not increase CPU load since they depend on software drivers for proper functioning.

Interfaces can also indirectly help you with higher-quality connectivity, lower latency, and dedicated driver support that may not be possible by your CPU alone. Now let’s discuss the above answer in more detail. But before that, we will break down a few concepts.

How can audio interface reduce CPU usage?

An audio interface can share tasks that the CPU otherwise has to perform, like Analog-to-Digital Conversion and Digital-to-Analog Conversion, pre-amplification, and digital signal processing (DSP). Next, thunderbolt and PCIe are high-speed data transfer technologies that, if present in your interface, will further help reduce CPU usage.

First, let’s talk about USB audio interfaces. Most of these devices do not have an onboard DSP. While they offload the ADC and DAC tasks from your CPU, they may still not reduce processor load and may even increase its burden because they use drivers, which require extra work by the CPU.

However, some USB audio interfaces come with onboard Digital Signal Processing (DSP) chips. While not as common as in Thunderbolt or PCIe interfaces, these chips can handle certain processing tasks, such as running audio effects or mixers, offloading some of the workloads from your computer’s CPU.

Next, thunderbolt and PCIe are high-speed data transfer technologies that offer significant advantages over USB regarding audio interfaces. They provide lower latency and higher bandwidth, enabling more efficient and direct communication between the interface and the computer instead of relying on drivers, possibly reducing CPU load.

Thunderbolt vs USB Audio Interface | Which Is Best For You?

Further, audio interfaces can reduce CPU usage in the following ways:

  • Offloading processing to the interface hardware
    Some audio interfaces have built-in DSP (Digital Signal Processing) chips that can handle certain processing tasks, such as EQ, compression, and reverb, without using the CPU. That reduces the computer’s CPU load, allowing it to focus on other tasks.
  • Buffer size adjustment
    Audio interfaces allow you to adjust the buffer size, determining the amount of audio data processed. Increasing the buffer size can reduce the number of times the CPU has to process audio data, which can help reduce CPU usage.
  • Dedicated ASIO drivers
    Audio interfaces often come with dedicated ASIO (Audio Stream Input/Output) drivers, which provide low-latency performance and efficient use of CPU resources. These drivers are designed specifically for the interface and can help reduce the CPU load.
  • Multicore processing
    Some audio interfaces have multicore processors that can split the processing workload across multiple cores, reducing the burden on a single core and improving overall performance.
  • Optimization of sample rate and bit depth
    Audio interfaces allow you to adjust the audio’s sample rate and bit depth. By optimizing these settings to match the project’s requirements, you can reduce the load on the CPU.
  • Direct Monitoring
    Many audio interfaces offer Direct Monitoring, which allows you to monitor your inputs directly without passing through your computer’s processing. This can reduce the load on your CPU, as it doesn’t need to process the incoming audio signal.
  • External Clocking
    Some audio interfaces also offer the ability to use an external clock to sync the interface’s sample rate with the rest of your studio setup. This can result in more accurate clocking and lower jitter, which can help reduce CPU usage.
  • Virtual Instruments
    Many music production workflows use virtual instruments, which can be very CPU-intensive. However, some audio interfaces offer a feature called “DSP load balancing,” which can help distribute the processing load between the interface’s DSP and the computer’s CPU. That can help reduce overall CPU usage and improve the performance of virtual instruments. You can read more about DSP resource management here.
  • Recording and Playback
    Audio interfaces can also improve the performance of recording and playback tasks. By handling the input and output tasks directly, the interface can reduce the load on the CPU, freeing it up to handle other tasks such as mixing, editing, and effects processing.

Overall, by utilizing these features, audio interfaces can help reduce CPU usage and improve the performance of your audio system. In addition, there are many ways by which an audio interface can indirectly improve audio quality and reduce CPU load. Here’s how it can do that:

  • Lower Latency
    An audio interface can provide lower latency than built-in sound cards designed specifically for audio recording and playback. Lower latency means the CPU has less work to do in real-time audio processing, which can reduce CPU load.
  • Better connectivity
    Audio interfaces typically offer a range of inputs and outputs that can accommodate various types of audio equipment, such as microphones, instruments, and speakers. This can help streamline your workflow and reduce the need for additional hardware or software, potentially lessening the burden on your CPU.
  • Scalability
    Some audio interfaces can be expanded with additional inputs, outputs, or processing capabilities, allowing you to grow your setup without overloading your CPU. This can help you maintain optimal performance as your needs change.
  • Stability
    High-quality audio interfaces are built with robust components and are less prone to hardware failures, which can cause CPU load spikes or crashes. This increased stability can contribute to a more efficient and reliable recording environment.

Can Audio Interface Reduce CPU Usage? |

Choosing the right interface for better CPU optimization

Different types of audio interfaces can affect the CPU load of your computer or digital audio workstation (DAW) in various ways. The main factors that can influence CPU load include the interface’s driver type, buffer size, and processing capabilities.

  • Driver Type
    Audio interfaces use different drivers to communicate with your computer. The most common driver types are ASIO (Audio Stream Input/Output) for Windows, Core Audio for macOS, and ALSA or JACK for Linux. ASIO and Core Audio are generally considered more efficient and can reduce CPU load compared to generic drivers, such as Windows DirectSound or MME.
    When choosing an audio interface, ensuring it supports the appropriate driver type for your system is essential.
  • Buffer Size
    The buffer size determines the audio data the interface processes at once. Larger buffer sizes increase the time your CPU has to process the data, reducing the likelihood of audio dropouts or glitches. However, larger buffers also increase latency, which can be detrimental to real-time monitoring and recording.
    Smaller buffer sizes decrease latency but may increase CPU load, as the CPU has less time to process the data. Balancing buffer size and CPU load is crucial for optimal performance.
  • Onboard DSP Processing
    Some audio interfaces come with onboard Digital Signal Processing (DSP) chips. These chips can handle certain processing tasks, such as running audio effects or mixers and offloading some workloads from your computer’s CPU. Interfaces with onboard DSP can help reduce CPU load, especially in complex projects with many tracks and effects.
    However, they may also be more expensive and typically offer a limited selection of compatible plugins.
  • USB vs. Thunderbolt vs. PCIe
    Audio interfaces can connect to your computer through USB, Thunderbolt, and PCIe ports. USB is the most common and widely compatible, but its data transfer rate and bandwidth are limited compared to Thunderbolt or PCIe.
    Thunderbolt and PCIe interfaces can offer lower latency and more stable performance, which may help reduce CPU load in some cases. However, they are usually more expensive and may require specific hardware compatibility.
    Lastly, FireWire is also widely used for audio and video production due to its high-speed data transfer rates, low latency, and stable performance.
HOW TO choose an Audio Interface – The Ultimate Guide


Ultimately, the effect of an audio interface on CPU load depends on several factors, including driver type, buffer size, onboard DSP processing, and connection type. To minimize CPU load, choose an interface that supports efficient drivers, offers adjustable buffer sizes, and consider interfaces with onboard DSP processing or faster connections like Thunderbolt or PCIe if your system supports them.

However, ensuring your computer’s CPU, RAM, and storage is adequate for your specific audio production needs is also essential. Lastly, here are some audio interface suggestions that you can consider:

  • Universal Audio Apollo series
    The Apollo series, which includes models like Apollo Twin, Apollo x4, and Apollo x8, offers high-quality AD/DA conversion and Thunderbolt connectivity for low latency and efficient data transfer. Apollo interfaces come with onboard DSP processing, allowing you to run UAD plugins without taxing your CPU.
  • RME Babyface Pro FS
    This USB interface is known for its exceptional performance and stability, thanks to its custom USB drivers and TotalMix FX software, which provides onboard DSP processing for mixing and routing. RME interfaces are renowned for their low-latency performance and efficient drivers.
  • MOTU Ultralite-mk5
    The Ultralite-mk5 offers USB-C and USB-A connectivity, with high-speed data transfer and low latency. It includes an onboard DSP processor for mixing and effects, reducing the load on your CPU.
  • Focusrite Scarlett series
    The Scarlett series, including the Scarlett 2i2 and Scarlett 18i20, offers efficient, low-latency drivers for Windows and macOS. While these interfaces do not have onboard DSP processing, they are known for their reliable performance and low-latency capabilities.

How do audio interfaces work?

Audio interfaces bridge analog and digital domains, allowing you to record, process, and playback audio on their computers or digital audio workstations (DAWs). Here’s an overview of how audio interfaces work:

  • Analog-to-Digital Conversion (ADC)
    The sound is initially captured as analog signals when you record audio using a microphone or instrument. These signals must be converted into digital data for further processing and storage. Audio interfaces contain ADCs, which convert the continuous analog signals into discrete digital samples represented as binary numbers. The quality of the ADC can significantly impact the fidelity of the recorded audio.
  • Digital-to-Analog Conversion (DAC)
    When you want to listen to the audio you’ve recorded or processed, the digital data must be converted into analog signals for speakers or headphones. Audio interfaces contain DACs that perform this task. As with ADCs, the quality of the DAC affects the fidelity of the audio.
  • Preamps and Gain Control
    Microphone signals are often weak and must be amplified before converting to digital. Audio interfaces have built-in preamplifiers that boost the signal level to an appropriate range. Gain control allows you to adjust the level of the incoming signal, which is essential for capturing clean, distortion-free recordings.
  • Input and Output Connectivity
    Audio interfaces provide a variety of inputs and outputs to accommodate different types of audio sources and playback devices. Common input types include XLR for microphones, 1/4-inch jacks for instruments, and MIDI for electronic instruments.
    Outputs typically include 1/4-inch jacks for studio monitors, headphones, and other devices, as well as MIDI and digital outputs like S/PDIF or ADAT.
  • Latency Management
    When processing audio in real-time, such as when recording or monitoring with effects, latency can be an issue. Latency refers to the time it takes for an audio signal to pass through the interface and be processed by the computer or DAW. High latency can cause noticeable delays and disrupt the creative process.
    Audio interfaces use dedicated drivers and internal buffering to minimize latency, ensuring a smooth and responsive workflow.
  • Software Integration
    Audio interfaces are designed to work seamlessly with DAWs and other audio software. They often include dedicated control panels or software applications for managing settings, routing, and monitoring. Some interfaces come bundled with DAWs or other audio plugins to provide a complete recording and production solution.

Can Audio Interface Reduce CPU Usage? |


We have discussed how CPU can offload CPU and give you better performance and quality for recording, mixing-mastering, and production. However, besides an audio interface, there are various ways to optimize your CPU and minimize lag and latency issues, which you can read here.

To sum it all up, while an audio interface, especially a USB audio interface, may not always reduce CPU load, it has various benefits, including better response time, high-quality rendering and recordings, better connectivity and drivers, and more. However, if you want a device that reduces CPU load, use a DSP-based interface with Thunderbolt or PCIe ports.

Apollo interfaces by Universal Audio, MOTU Ultralite-mk5, and RME Babyface Pro FS are great audio interfaces that can reduce CPU usage and improve performance. I hope the article was of help. Thank you for reading.

Don`t copy text!
Scroll to Top